Low income vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Low income
5.1%
in 2025
South Africa
17.4%
in 2025
Low income rank
7th
South Africa rank
10th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Low income
  • South Africa
-2002040196119932025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 17.4% against 5.1% in Low income, a difference of 12.3%.

That makes South Africa's figure about 3.4 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was South Africa ahead.

Low income ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 10th of 46 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Low income averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income South Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 4.0% 9.4% 5.4% South Africa
1990s 2.8% 0.8% 2.0% Low income
2000s 2.4% 2.7% 0.3% South Africa
2010s 2.3% 2.3% 0.1% South Africa
2020s 2.7% 4.8% 2.0% South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Low income or South Africa?
South Africa, at 17.4% against 5.1% in Low income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Low income and South Africa?
12.3%, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and South Africa?
41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
How do Low income and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Low income ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 10th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/low-income/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/low-income/south-africa/">Low income vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth)
Unit
annual % growth
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
244 places, 10,541 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.