Late-demographic dividend vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Late-demographic dividend
4.3%
in 2025
Micronesia, Federated States of
12.7%
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend rank
11th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
12th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Micronesia, Federated States of
-10-5051015196119932025

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 12.7% against 4.3% in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 8.4%.

That makes Micronesia, Federated States of's figure about 3.0 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 11th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 12th of 46 groups.

Late-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Micronesia, Federated States of Difference Ahead
1990s 2.8% -1.6% 4.5% Late-demographic dividend
2000s 3.6% 1.1% 2.5% Late-demographic dividend
2010s 3.4% 1.3% 2.1% Late-demographic dividend
2020s 3.8% 0.1% 3.8% Late-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Late-demographic dividend or Micronesia, Federated States of?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 12.7% against 4.3% in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Late-demographic dividend and Micronesia, Federated States of?
8.4%, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Micronesia, Federated States of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 11th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 12th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/late-demographic-dividend/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/late-demographic-dividend/micronesia-fed-sts/">Late-demographic dividend vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth)
Unit
annual % growth
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
244 places, 10,541 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.