Isle of Man vs Palau: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time
- Isle of Man
- Palau
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports -2.0% against -2.2% in Palau, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Palau ahead.
Isle of Man ranks 167th and Palau ranks 168th of 197 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Isle of Man averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -4.8% | -0.0% | 4.8% | Palau |
| 2020s | 1.2% | -3.4% | 4.6% | Isle of Man |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Isle of Man or Palau?
- Isle of Man, at -2.0% against -2.2% in Palau as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Isle of Man and Palau?
- 0.2%, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Palau?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Isle of Man and Palau rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
- Isle of Man ranks 167th and Palau ranks 168th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.