Iceland vs Myanmar: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time
- Iceland
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports -1.1% against -1.2% in Iceland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Myanmar ahead.
Iceland ranks 161st and Myanmar ranks 159th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4% | 8.4% | 8.0% | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.5% | Iceland |
| 2020s | -1.2% | -3.9% | 2.7% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Iceland or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at -1.1% against -1.2% in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Iceland and Myanmar?
- 0.1%, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Myanmar?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Myanmar rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
- Iceland ranks 161st and Myanmar ranks 159th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.