Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Mongolia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
5.2%
in 2025
Mongolia
33.2%
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
5th
Mongolia rank
2nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Mongolia
-2002040198220032025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 33.2% against 5.2% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 28.0%.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 6.3 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Mongolia ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 5th and Mongolia ranks 2nd of 46 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Mongolia Difference Ahead
1980s 7.3% 7.7% 0.4% Mongolia
1990s 3.1% 2.1% 1.0% Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2000s 2.9% 1.5% 1.4% Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 3.4% 6.5% 3.0% Mongolia
2020s 3.5% 1.3% 2.1% Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 33.2% against 5.2% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Mongolia?
28.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Mongolia?
37 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Mongolia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 5th and Mongolia ranks 2nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Mongolia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/mongolia/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Mongolia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth)
Unit
annual % growth
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
244 places, 10,541 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.