East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Moldova: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
4.0%
in 2025
Moldova
10.7%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
15th
Moldova rank
16th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Moldova
-40-200204060196119932025

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 10.7% against 4.0% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 6.7%.

That makes Moldova's figure about 2.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Moldova ranks 16th of 46 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 3 and Moldova in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 3.2% -2.6% 5.9% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 3.8% 1.9% 1.9% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2010s 3.6% 5.3% 1.7% Moldova
2020s 3.8% 2.8% 1.0% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Moldova?
Moldova, at 10.7% against 4.0% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Moldova?
6.7%, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Moldova?
30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Moldova rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Moldova ranks 16th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Moldova: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/moldova/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Moldova: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth)
Unit
annual % growth
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
244 places, 10,541 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.