Bermuda vs Lithuania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time
- Bermuda
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports -0.0% against -0.2% in Bermuda, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Lithuania ahead.
Bermuda ranks 154th and Lithuania ranks 151st of 197 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.1% | 2.4% | 2.5% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | -2.3% | 2.3% | 4.6% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Bermuda or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at -0.0% against -0.2% in Bermuda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Bermuda and Lithuania?
- 0.2%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Lithuania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Bermuda and Lithuania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
- Bermuda ranks 154th and Lithuania ranks 151st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.