Belarus vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and

Belarus
15.94 Percentage of GDP
in 2013
Tanzania, United Republic of
16.27 Percentage of GDP
in 2019
Belarus rank
63rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
60th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and over time

  • Belarus
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
57.51012.51517.5200020092019

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 16.27 Percentage of GDP against 15.94 Percentage of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0.33 Percentage of GDP.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 63rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 60th of 147 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 9.84 Percentage of GDP 7.59 Percentage of GDP 2.25 Percentage of GDP Belarus
2010s 16.16 Percentage of GDP 10.87 Percentage of GDP 5.29 Percentage of GDP Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and, Belarus or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 16.27 Percentage of GDP against 15.94 Percentage of GDP in Belarus as of 2019.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and between Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.33 Percentage of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of?
14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
How do Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and?
Belarus ranks 63rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 60th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and capital stock — Private investment (gross fixed capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-21-investment-and-capital-stock-private/belarus/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-21-investment-and-capital-stock-private/belarus/tanzania/">Belarus vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and capital stock — Private investment (gross fixed capital formation)
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
214 places, 4,195 data points, 2000–2019
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 21 shows indicators of investment flows and capital stocks, in US dollars and as a percentage of GDP, including general government investment, public-private partnerships, and private investment.