Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Croatia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
171.64 Percentage of GDP
in 2019
Croatia
175.61 Percentage of GDP
in 2019
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) rank
11th
Croatia rank
9th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and over time

  • Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
  • Croatia
050100150200200020092019

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 175.61 Percentage of GDP against 171.64 Percentage of GDP in Arab Maghreb Union (UMA), a difference of 3.97 Percentage of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ahead.

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 11th and Croatia ranks 9th of 27 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) Croatia Difference Ahead
2000s 131.52 Percentage of GDP 111.93 Percentage of GDP 19.59 Percentage of GDP Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
2010s 156.92 Percentage of GDP 174.18 Percentage of GDP 17.26 Percentage of GDP Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) or Croatia?
Croatia, at 175.61 Percentage of GDP against 171.64 Percentage of GDP in Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) as of 2019.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and between Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Croatia?
3.97 Percentage of GDP, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Croatia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Croatia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and?
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 11th and Croatia ranks 9th of 27 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and capital stock — Private capital stock. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Croatia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-21-investment-and-capital-stock-private-capital/arab-maghreb-union-uma/croatia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-21-investment-and-capital-stock-private-capital/arab-maghreb-union-uma/croatia-2/">Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Croatia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and capital stock — Private capital stock
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
216 places, 4,249 data points, 2000–2019
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 21 shows indicators of investment flows and capital stocks, in US dollars and as a percentage of GDP, including general government investment, public-private partnerships, and private investment.