Latvia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and

Latvia
49.68 Percentage of GDP
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
89.02 Percentage of GDP
in 2019
Latvia rank
33rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
35th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and over time

  • Latvia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
20406080100200020092019

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 89.02 Percentage of GDP against 49.68 Percentage of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 39.34 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.8 times Latvia's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 33rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 35th of 40 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 20.1 Percentage of GDP 84.43 Percentage of GDP 64.32 Percentage of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 44.39 Percentage of GDP 91.13 Percentage of GDP 46.74 Percentage of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and, Latvia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 89.02 Percentage of GDP against 49.68 Percentage of GDP in Latvia as of 2019.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and between Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
39.34 Percentage of GDP, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and?
Latvia ranks 33rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 35th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and capital stock — General government capital stock. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-21-investment-and-capital-stock-general-2/latvia-2/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-21-investment-and-capital-stock-general-2/latvia-2/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Latvia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and capital stock — General government capital stock
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
216 places, 4,249 data points, 2000–2019
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 21 shows indicators of investment flows and capital stocks, in US dollars and as a percentage of GDP, including general government investment, public-private partnerships, and private investment.