Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Lesotho: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
92.12 Percentage of GDP
in 2019
Lesotho
121.77 Percentage of GDP
in 2019
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) rank
5th
Lesotho rank
2nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and over time

  • Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
  • Lesotho
050100150200020092019

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 121.77 Percentage of GDP against 92.12 Percentage of GDP in Arab Maghreb Union (UMA), a difference of 29.65 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.3 times Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 5th and Lesotho ranks 2nd of 27 groups.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 136.9 Percentage of GDP 148.58 Percentage of GDP 11.68 Percentage of GDP Lesotho
2010s 87.46 Percentage of GDP 113.65 Percentage of GDP 26.19 Percentage of GDP Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 121.77 Percentage of GDP against 92.12 Percentage of GDP in Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) as of 2019.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and between Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Lesotho?
29.65 Percentage of GDP, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Lesotho?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Lesotho rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 21 - investment and?
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 5th and Lesotho ranks 2nd of 27 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and capital stock — General government capital stock. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Lesotho: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-21-investment-and-capital-stock-general-2/arab-maghreb-union-uma/lesotho-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-21-investment-and-capital-stock-general-2/arab-maghreb-union-uma/lesotho-2/">Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Lesotho: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 21 - Investment and capital stock — General government capital stock
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
216 places, 4,249 data points, 2000–2019
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 21 shows indicators of investment flows and capital stocks, in US dollars and as a percentage of GDP, including general government investment, public-private partnerships, and private investment.