Equatorial Guinea vs South Africa: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by

Equatorial Guinea
1,180 US dollar
in 2022
South Africa
84,051 US dollar
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
24th
South Africa rank
27th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • South Africa
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k200020112022

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 84,051 US dollar against 1,180 US dollar in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 82,871 US dollar.

That makes South Africa's figure about 71.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th and South Africa ranks 27th of 28 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 231.47 US dollar 36,520 US dollar 36,288 US dollar South Africa
2010s 384.07 US dollar 59,711 US dollar 59,327 US dollar South Africa
2020s 560.54 US dollar 74,919 US dollar 74,358 US dollar South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by, Equatorial Guinea or South Africa?
South Africa, at 84,051 US dollar against 1,180 US dollar in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by between Equatorial Guinea and South Africa?
82,871 US dollar, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Africa?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and South Africa rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th and South Africa ranks 27th of 28 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs South Africa: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/equatorial-guinea-2/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/equatorial-guinea-2/south-africa/">Equatorial Guinea vs South Africa: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
243 places, 5,330 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 17 shows data on public finance, including taxes, revenues, expenditure, and debt. Some of these figures are not available at the national level, but only for aggregations of groups of countries.