How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?

22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Namibia: Africa's Development: Trade by manufacturing intensity Total … 17

Congo

3,617 US dollar

in 2022

Namibia

3,717 US dollar

in 2022

Congo rank

93rd

Namibia rank

91st

Africa's Development: Trade by manufacturing intensity Total … 17 over time

Congo
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 3,717 US dollar against 3,617 US dollar in Congo, a difference of 100 US dollar.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.

Congo ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 91st of 168 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	492.95 US dollar	1,962 US dollar	1,469 US dollar	Namibia
2010s	2,101 US dollar	3,544 US dollar	1,442 US dollar	Namibia
2020s	3,386 US dollar	3,462 US dollar	75.95 US dollar	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by, Congo or Namibia?: Namibia, at 3,717 US dollar against 3,617 US dollar in Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by between Congo and Namibia?: 100 US dollar, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by?: Congo ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 91st of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods
Unit: US dollar
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence: OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 243 places, 5,330 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 17 shows data on public finance, including taxes, revenues, expenditure, and debt. Some of these figures are not available at the national level, but only for aggregations of groups of countries.