Central African Republic vs Kiribati: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by

Central African Republic
124.22 US dollar
in 2022
Kiribati
103.71 US dollar
in 2022
Central African Republic rank
146th
Kiribati rank
148th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Kiribati
050100150200020112022

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 124.22 US dollar against 103.71 US dollar in Kiribati, a difference of 20.51 US dollar.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 146th and Kiribati ranks 148th of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 34.05 US dollar 15.27 US dollar 18.77 US dollar Central African Republic
2010s 33.83 US dollar 85.68 US dollar 51.85 US dollar Kiribati
2020s 88.28 US dollar 95.35 US dollar 7.07 US dollar Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by, Central African Republic or Kiribati?
Central African Republic, at 124.22 US dollar against 103.71 US dollar in Kiribati as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by between Central African Republic and Kiribati?
20.51 US dollar, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Kiribati?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Central African Republic and Kiribati rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by?
Central African Republic ranks 146th and Kiribati ranks 148th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Kiribati: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/central-african-republic/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/central-african-republic/kiribati/">Central African Republic vs Kiribati: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
243 places, 5,330 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 17 shows data on public finance, including taxes, revenues, expenditure, and debt. Some of these figures are not available at the national level, but only for aggregations of groups of countries.