How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Libya?

22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs Libya: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by

Botswana

2,068 US dollar

in 2022

Libya

2,012 US dollar

in 2022

Botswana rank

109th

Libya rank

111th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by over time

Botswana
Libya

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 2,068 US dollar against 2,012 US dollar in Libya, a difference of 56 US dollar.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Libya ahead.

Botswana ranks 109th and Libya ranks 111th of 168 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	Libya	Difference	Ahead
2000s	1,002 US dollar	4,084 US dollar	3,082 US dollar	Libya
2010s	1,456 US dollar	2,695 US dollar	1,238 US dollar	Libya
2020s	1,435 US dollar	1,724 US dollar	289.36 US dollar	Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by, Botswana or Libya?: Botswana, at 2,068 US dollar against 2,012 US dollar in Libya as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by between Botswana and Libya?: 56 US dollar, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Libya?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Botswana and Libya rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by?: Botswana ranks 109th and Libya ranks 111th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Libya: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/botswana/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/botswana/libya/">Botswana vs Libya: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods
Unit: US dollar
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence: OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 243 places, 5,330 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 17 shows data on public finance, including taxes, revenues, expenditure, and debt. Some of these figures are not available at the national level, but only for aggregations of groups of countries.