Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Switzerland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
56,957 US dollar
in 2022
Switzerland
250,265 US dollar
in 2022
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) rank
13th
Switzerland rank
14th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by over time

  • Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
  • Switzerland
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k200020112022

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 250,265 US dollar against 56,957 US dollar in Arab Maghreb Union (UMA), a difference of 193,308 US dollar.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 4.4 times Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)'s.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 13th and Switzerland ranks 14th of 28 groups.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 21,699 US dollar 80,522 US dollar 58,822 US dollar Switzerland
2010s 37,191 US dollar 181,272 US dollar 144,081 US dollar Switzerland
2020s 45,492 US dollar 219,286 US dollar 173,794 US dollar Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 250,265 US dollar against 56,957 US dollar in Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by between Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Switzerland?
193,308 US dollar, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Switzerland?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Switzerland rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 17 - trade by?
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 13th and Switzerland ranks 14th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Switzerland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/arab-maghreb-union-uma/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-17-trade-by-manufacturing-intensity-total/arab-maghreb-union-uma/switzerland/">Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Switzerland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 17 - Trade by manufacturing intensity — Total exports of semi-processed goods
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
243 places, 5,330 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 17 shows data on public finance, including taxes, revenues, expenditure, and debt. Some of these figures are not available at the national level, but only for aggregations of groups of countries.