Singapore vs Palestine: Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — Value — Male — All
Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — Value — Male — All over time
- Singapore
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 98.98 % against 98.94 % in Singapore, a difference of 0.04 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 12th and Palestine ranks 10th of 45 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.55 % | 98.25 % | 0.3067 % | Singapore |
| 2020s | 98.54 % | 98.82 % | 0.28 % | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — value — male — all, Singapore or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 98.98 % against 98.94 % in Singapore as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — value — male — all between Singapore and Palestine?
- 0.04 %, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Palestine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Singapore and Palestine rank globally for adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — value — male — all?
- Singapore ranks 12th and Palestine ranks 10th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.