Dominican Republic vs Peru: Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — Value — Female
Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — Value — Female over time
- Dominican Republic
- Peru
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 95.53 % against 94.84 % in Peru, a difference of 0.69 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Peru ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 26th of 46 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.12 % | 92.36 % | 1.24 % | Peru |
| 2010s | 94.25 % | 94.69 % | 0.44 % | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — value — female, Dominican Republic or Peru?
- Dominican Republic, at 95.53 % against 94.84 % in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — value — female between Dominican Republic and Peru?
- 0.69 %, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Dominican Republic and Peru rank globally for adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — value — female?
- Dominican Republic ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 26th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.