Bangladesh vs Cambodia: Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — Value — All age
Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — Value — All age over time
- Bangladesh
- Cambodia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 81.67 % against 79 % in Bangladesh, a difference of 2.67 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Cambodia ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 38th and Cambodia ranks 37th of 45 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Cambodia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 76.65 % | 91.26 % | 14.61 % | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 82.45 % | 81.67 % | 0.78 % | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — value — all age, Bangladesh or Cambodia?
- Cambodia, at 81.67 % against 79 % in Bangladesh as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — value — all age between Bangladesh and Cambodia?
- 2.67 %, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cambodia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Bangladesh and Cambodia rank globally for adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — value — all age?
- Bangladesh ranks 38th and Cambodia ranks 37th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.