Mongolia vs Palestine: Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — Value — All age
Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — Value — All age over time
- Mongolia
- Palestine
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 97.2 % against 97.08 % in Palestine, a difference of 0.12 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 8th and Palestine ranks 9th of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 95.31 % | 95.56 % | 0.2567 % | Palestine |
| 2020s | 98.01 % | 96.96 % | 1.05 % | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — value — all age, Mongolia or Palestine?
- Mongolia, at 97.2 % against 97.08 % in Palestine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — value — all age between Mongolia and Palestine?
- 0.12 %, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Palestine?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Mongolia and Palestine rank globally for adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — value — all age?
- Mongolia ranks 8th and Palestine ranks 9th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.