Ecuador vs Indonesia: Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — Value — All age
Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — Value — All age over time
- Ecuador
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 93.64 % against 93.16 % in Ecuador, a difference of 0.48 %.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 14th and Indonesia ranks 13th of 41 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.57 % | 89.22 % | 4.65 % | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 86.8 % | 91.4 % | 4.6 % | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 87.69 % | 93.64 % | 5.95 % | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — value — all age, Ecuador or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 93.64 % against 93.16 % in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — value — all age between Ecuador and Indonesia?
- 0.48 %, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Indonesia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Indonesia rank globally for adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — value — all age?
- Ecuador ranks 14th and Indonesia ranks 13th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.