Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time
- Lesotho
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.7% against 1.5% in Lesotho, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Lesotho ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 177 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.9% | 2.3% | 0.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1.4% | 2.7% | 1.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 1.8% | 0.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 1.7% | 0.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Lesotho or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.7% against 1.5% in Lesotho as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Lesotho and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
- Lesotho ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.