Kazakhstan vs Peru: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time
- Kazakhstan
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Peru ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 117th and Peru ranks 114th of 177 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.3% | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.1% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Kazakhstan or Peru?
- Peru, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Kazakhstan and Peru?
- 0.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Peru?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Peru rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
- Kazakhstan ranks 117th and Peru ranks 114th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.