Cape Verde vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time
- Cape Verde
- South Africa
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 78th and South Africa ranks 81st of 177 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.5% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.2% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Cape Verde or South Africa?
- Cape Verde, at 0.4% against 0.4% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Cape Verde and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and South Africa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Cape Verde and South Africa rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
- Cape Verde ranks 78th and South Africa ranks 81st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.