Suriname vs United States Virgin Islands: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Suriname
6.64 million current US$
in 2021
United States Virgin Islands
7.80 million current US$
in 2020
Suriname rank
172nd
United States Virgin Islands rank
169th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Suriname
  • United States Virgin Islands
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M199020052021

How they compare

United States Virgin Islands currently reports 7.80 million current US$ against 6.64 million current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 1.15 million current US$.

That makes United States Virgin Islands's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Suriname ahead.

Suriname ranks 172nd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 169th of 179 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 2 and United States Virgin Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 6.83 million current US$ 5.24 million current US$ 1.60 million current US$ Suriname
2010s 10.56 million current US$ 6.77 million current US$ 3.79 million current US$ Suriname
2020s 6.75 million current US$ 7.80 million current US$ 1.05 million current US$ United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Suriname or United States Virgin Islands?
United States Virgin Islands, at 7.80 million current US$ against 6.64 million current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Suriname and United States Virgin Islands?
1.15 million current US$, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and United States Virgin Islands?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do Suriname and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Suriname ranks 172nd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 169th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs United States Virgin Islands: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/suriname/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/suriname/virgin-islands-u-s/">Suriname vs United States Virgin Islands: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.