Russian Federation vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Russian Federation
2.46 billion current US$
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
2.67 billion current US$
in 2021
Russian Federation rank
15th
Saudi Arabia rank
12th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Saudi Arabia
1.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B199020052021

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 2.67 billion current US$ against 2.46 billion current US$ in Russian Federation, a difference of 215.99 million current US$.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 15th and Saudi Arabia ranks 12th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.46 billion current US$ 769.43 million current US$ 687.96 million current US$ Russian Federation
2000s 2.00 billion current US$ 1.22 billion current US$ 776.35 million current US$ Russian Federation
2010s 3.27 billion current US$ 2.28 billion current US$ 993.50 million current US$ Russian Federation
2020s 2.29 billion current US$ 2.49 billion current US$ 193.56 million current US$ Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Russian Federation or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 2.67 billion current US$ against 2.46 billion current US$ in Russian Federation as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia?
215.99 million current US$, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Russian Federation ranks 15th and Saudi Arabia ranks 12th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/russian-federation/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/russian-federation/saudi-arabia/">Russian Federation vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.