Poland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Poland
1.04 billion current US$
in 2021
Tanzania, United Republic of
937.45 million current US$
in 2021
Poland rank
28th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
29th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Poland
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B199020052021

How they compare

Poland currently reports 1.04 billion current US$ against 937.45 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 98.60 million current US$.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 28th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 29th of 179 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 654.86 million current US$ 267.26 million current US$ 387.60 million current US$ Poland
2000s 786.10 million current US$ 409.39 million current US$ 376.71 million current US$ Poland
2010s 904.88 million current US$ 601.72 million current US$ 303.16 million current US$ Poland
2020s 998.38 million current US$ 901.41 million current US$ 96.97 million current US$ Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Poland or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Poland, at 1.04 billion current US$ against 937.45 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Poland and Tanzania, United Republic of?
98.60 million current US$, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tanzania, United Republic of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Poland and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Poland ranks 28th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 29th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/poland/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/poland/tanzania/">Poland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.