North Macedonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

North Macedonia
40.28 million current US$
in 2021
Trinidad and Tobago
38.79 million current US$
in 2021
North Macedonia rank
139th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
141st

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M199020052021

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 40.28 million current US$ against 38.79 million current US$ in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.50 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 139th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 141st of 179 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 31.35 million current US$ 20.17 million current US$ 11.18 million current US$ North Macedonia
2000s 35.24 million current US$ 23.70 million current US$ 11.54 million current US$ North Macedonia
2010s 40.09 million current US$ 32.95 million current US$ 7.14 million current US$ North Macedonia
2020s 39.41 million current US$ 35.71 million current US$ 3.70 million current US$ North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, North Macedonia or Trinidad and Tobago?
North Macedonia, at 40.28 million current US$ against 38.79 million current US$ in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
1.50 million current US$, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
North Macedonia ranks 139th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/north-macedonia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/north-macedonia/trinidad-and-tobago/">North Macedonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.