Malawi vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Malawi
136.71 million current US$
in 2021
Tunisia
151.64 million current US$
in 2021
Malawi rank
98th
Tunisia rank
95th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Malawi
  • Tunisia
50.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M199020052021

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 151.64 million current US$ against 136.71 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 14.93 million current US$.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.

Malawi ranks 98th and Tunisia ranks 95th of 179 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 47.09 million current US$ 125.47 million current US$ 78.38 million current US$ Tunisia
2000s 63.64 million current US$ 136.49 million current US$ 72.85 million current US$ Tunisia
2010s 98.11 million current US$ 154.66 million current US$ 56.55 million current US$ Tunisia
2020s 137.14 million current US$ 146.85 million current US$ 9.71 million current US$ Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Malawi or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 151.64 million current US$ against 136.71 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Malawi and Tunisia?
14.93 million current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tunisia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Malawi and Tunisia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Malawi ranks 98th and Tunisia ranks 95th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/malawi/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/malawi/tunisia/">Malawi vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.