Kazakhstan vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time
- Kazakhstan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 341.18 million current US$ against 330.48 million current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 10.70 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Sudan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 66th and South Sudan ranks 65th of 179 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 390.07 million current US$ | 424.36 million current US$ | 34.29 million current US$ | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 460.98 million current US$ | 488.78 million current US$ | 27.79 million current US$ | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Kazakhstan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 341.18 million current US$ against 330.48 million current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Kazakhstan and South Sudan?
- 10.70 million current US$, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Kazakhstan and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
- Kazakhstan ranks 66th and South Sudan ranks 65th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.