Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Guinea-Bissau
28.33 million current US$
in 2021
Solomon Islands
30.30 million current US$
in 2021
Guinea-Bissau rank
150th
Solomon Islands rank
147th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Solomon Islands
5.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M30.0M199020052021

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 30.30 million current US$ against 28.33 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.97 million current US$.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 150th and Solomon Islands ranks 147th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 10.77 million current US$ 9.34 million current US$ 1.43 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 18.98 million current US$ 12.41 million current US$ 6.56 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 25.82 million current US$ 24.63 million current US$ 1.20 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 27.35 million current US$ 29.45 million current US$ 2.10 million current US$ Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Guinea-Bissau or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 30.30 million current US$ against 28.33 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands?
1.97 million current US$, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 150th and Solomon Islands ranks 147th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/guinea-bissau/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/guinea-bissau/solomon-islands/">Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.