Finland vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Finland
39.11 million current US$
in 2021
Uruguay
38.32 million current US$
in 2021
Finland rank
140th
Uruguay rank
143rd

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Finland
  • Uruguay
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199020052021

How they compare

Finland currently reports 39.11 million current US$ against 38.32 million current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 792,100 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 140th and Uruguay ranks 143rd of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 62.11 million current US$ 27.57 million current US$ 34.54 million current US$ Finland
2000s 50.01 million current US$ 20.60 million current US$ 29.42 million current US$ Finland
2010s 39.41 million current US$ 37.18 million current US$ 2.22 million current US$ Finland
2020s 36.43 million current US$ 37.18 million current US$ 751,900 current US$ Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Finland or Uruguay?
Finland, at 39.11 million current US$ against 38.32 million current US$ in Uruguay as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Finland and Uruguay?
792,100 current US$, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Uruguay?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Finland and Uruguay rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Finland ranks 140th and Uruguay ranks 143rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/finland/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/finland/uruguay/">Finland vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.