Eswatini vs Latvia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Eswatini
47.48 million current US$
in 2021
Latvia
51.32 million current US$
in 2021
Eswatini rank
133rd
Latvia rank
131st

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Eswatini
  • Latvia
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199020052021

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 51.32 million current US$ against 47.48 million current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 3.84 million current US$.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 133rd and Latvia ranks 131st of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 38.27 million current US$ 26.76 million current US$ 11.51 million current US$ Eswatini
2000s 48.72 million current US$ 46.46 million current US$ 2.27 million current US$ Eswatini
2010s 60.79 million current US$ 44.46 million current US$ 16.33 million current US$ Eswatini
2020s 45.43 million current US$ 48.09 million current US$ 2.66 million current US$ Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Eswatini or Latvia?
Latvia, at 51.32 million current US$ against 47.48 million current US$ in Eswatini as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Eswatini and Latvia?
3.84 million current US$, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Latvia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Latvia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Eswatini ranks 133rd and Latvia ranks 131st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Latvia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/eswatini/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/eswatini/latvia/">Eswatini vs Latvia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.