Denmark vs Mozambique, Republic of: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Denmark
161.47 million current US$
in 2021
Mozambique, Republic of
170.12 million current US$
in 2021
Denmark rank
91st
Mozambique, Republic of rank
89th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Denmark
  • Mozambique, Republic of
50.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M199020052021

How they compare

Mozambique, Republic of currently reports 170.12 million current US$ against 161.47 million current US$ in Denmark, a difference of 8.65 million current US$.

That makes Mozambique, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 91st and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 89th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique, Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Mozambique, Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 172.08 million current US$ 88.36 million current US$ 83.72 million current US$ Denmark
2000s 188.17 million current US$ 134.78 million current US$ 53.38 million current US$ Denmark
2010s 179.33 million current US$ 177.46 million current US$ 1.87 million current US$ Denmark
2020s 159.90 million current US$ 162.24 million current US$ 2.34 million current US$ Mozambique, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Denmark or Mozambique, Republic of?
Mozambique, Republic of, at 170.12 million current US$ against 161.47 million current US$ in Denmark as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Denmark and Mozambique, Republic of?
8.65 million current US$, with Mozambique, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Mozambique, Republic of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Denmark and Mozambique, Republic of rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Denmark ranks 91st and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 89th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Mozambique, Republic of: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/denmark/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/denmark/mozambique/">Denmark vs Mozambique, Republic of: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.