Denmark vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Denmark
161.47 million current US$
in 2021
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
158.79 million current US$
in 2021
Denmark rank
91st
Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Denmark
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
50.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M199020052021

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 161.47 million current US$ against 158.79 million current US$ in Lao People’s Democratic Republic, a difference of 2.68 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 91st and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 93rd of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 3 and Lao People’s Democratic Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Lao People’s Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 174.03 million current US$ 49.77 million current US$ 124.26 million current US$ Denmark
2000s 188.17 million current US$ 59.46 million current US$ 128.71 million current US$ Denmark
2010s 179.33 million current US$ 134.83 million current US$ 44.50 million current US$ Denmark
2020s 159.90 million current US$ 160.60 million current US$ 694,500 current US$ Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Denmark or Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
Denmark, at 161.47 million current US$ against 158.79 million current US$ in Lao People’s Democratic Republic as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Denmark and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
2.68 million current US$, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Denmark and Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Denmark ranks 91st and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 93rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/denmark/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/denmark/lao-pdr/">Denmark vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.