Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Somalia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
535.22 million current US$
in 2021
Somalia
537.85 million current US$
in 2021
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
42nd
Somalia rank
41st

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Somalia
100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M600.0M199020052021

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 537.85 million current US$ against 535.22 million current US$ in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 2.63 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 42nd and Somalia ranks 41st of 179 countries.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Somalia Difference Ahead
1990s 260.62 million current US$ 89.83 million current US$ 170.79 million current US$ Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 498.07 million current US$ 418.51 million current US$ 79.56 million current US$ Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 523.56 million current US$ 516.13 million current US$ 7.43 million current US$ Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Somalia?
Somalia, at 537.85 million current US$ against 535.22 million current US$ in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Somalia?
2.63 million current US$, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Somalia?
10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Somalia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 42nd and Somalia ranks 41st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Somalia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/congo-dem-rep/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/congo-dem-rep/somalia-fed-rep/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Somalia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.