Central African Republic vs Vanuatu: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Central African Republic
24.42 million current US$
in 2021
Vanuatu
22.74 million current US$
in 2020
Central African Republic rank
155th
Vanuatu rank
156th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Vanuatu
10.0M20.0M30.0M199020052021

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 24.42 million current US$ against 22.74 million current US$ in Vanuatu, a difference of 1.68 million current US$.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Vanuatu's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 155th and Vanuatu ranks 156th of 179 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1990s 23.07 million current US$ 8.29 million current US$ 14.78 million current US$ Central African Republic
2000s 19.99 million current US$ 12.14 million current US$ 7.85 million current US$ Central African Republic
2010s 23.20 million current US$ 20.45 million current US$ 2.75 million current US$ Central African Republic
2020s 22.98 million current US$ 22.74 million current US$ 239,700 current US$ Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Central African Republic or Vanuatu?
Central African Republic, at 24.42 million current US$ against 22.74 million current US$ in Vanuatu as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Central African Republic and Vanuatu?
1.68 million current US$, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Vanuatu?
31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
How do Central African Republic and Vanuatu rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Central African Republic ranks 155th and Vanuatu ranks 156th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Vanuatu: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/central-african-republic/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/central-african-republic/vanuatu/">Central African Republic vs Vanuatu: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.