Cambodia vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Cambodia
134.42 million current US$
in 2021
Cuba
150.91 million current US$
in 2020
Cambodia rank
99th
Cuba rank
96th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Cambodia
  • Cuba
050.0M100.0M150.0M199020052021

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 150.91 million current US$ against 134.42 million current US$ in Cambodia, a difference of 16.49 million current US$.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cuba ahead.

Cambodia ranks 99th and Cuba ranks 96th of 179 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Cuba Difference Ahead
1990s 66.12 million current US$ 73.90 million current US$ 7.78 million current US$ Cuba
2000s 64.24 million current US$ 64.98 million current US$ 738,770 current US$ Cuba
2010s 104.97 million current US$ 112.66 million current US$ 7.69 million current US$ Cuba
2020s 134.17 million current US$ 150.91 million current US$ 16.73 million current US$ Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Cambodia or Cuba?
Cuba, at 150.91 million current US$ against 134.42 million current US$ in Cambodia as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Cambodia and Cuba?
16.49 million current US$, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Cuba?
28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2020.
How do Cambodia and Cuba rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Cambodia ranks 99th and Cuba ranks 96th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/cambodia/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/cambodia/cuba/">Cambodia vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.