Burkina Faso vs Peru: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Burkina Faso
429.62 million current US$
in 2021
Peru
439.79 million current US$
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
52nd
Peru rank
50th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Peru
100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M199020052021

How they compare

Peru currently reports 439.79 million current US$ against 429.62 million current US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 10.17 million current US$.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 52nd and Peru ranks 50th of 179 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 103.25 million current US$ 303.69 million current US$ 200.45 million current US$ Peru
2000s 179.21 million current US$ 241.48 million current US$ 62.28 million current US$ Peru
2010s 329.96 million current US$ 436.64 million current US$ 106.68 million current US$ Peru
2020s 421.07 million current US$ 447.51 million current US$ 26.44 million current US$ Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Burkina Faso or Peru?
Peru, at 439.79 million current US$ against 429.62 million current US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Burkina Faso and Peru?
10.17 million current US$, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Peru?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Burkina Faso and Peru rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Burkina Faso ranks 52nd and Peru ranks 50th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Peru: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/burkina-faso/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/burkina-faso/peru/">Burkina Faso vs Peru: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.