Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
170.79 million current US$
in 2021
Zambia
180.16 million current US$
in 2020
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
88th
Zambia rank
87th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Zambia
100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M199020052021

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 180.16 million current US$ against 170.79 million current US$ in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 9.37 million current US$.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia, Plurinational State of's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 87th of 179 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 109.51 million current US$ 144.61 million current US$ 35.09 million current US$ Zambia
2000s 83.95 million current US$ 217.48 million current US$ 133.53 million current US$ Zambia
2010s 139.19 million current US$ 354.19 million current US$ 215.00 million current US$ Zambia
2020s 167.55 million current US$ 180.16 million current US$ 12.62 million current US$ Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Zambia?
Zambia, at 180.16 million current US$ against 170.79 million current US$ in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zambia?
9.37 million current US$, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zambia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 87th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/bolivia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/bolivia/zambia/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.