Australia vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage

Australia
300.02 million current US$
in 2021
Sri Lanka
279.25 million current US$
in 2021
Australia rank
70th
Sri Lanka rank
73rd

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage over time

  • Australia
  • Sri Lanka
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199020052021

How they compare

Australia currently reports 300.02 million current US$ against 279.25 million current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 20.77 million current US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 179 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 136.03 million current US$ 48.44 million current US$ 87.59 million current US$ Australia
2000s 156.10 million current US$ 86.09 million current US$ 70.01 million current US$ Australia
2010s 272.61 million current US$ 243.76 million current US$ 28.85 million current US$ Australia
2020s 279.59 million current US$ 276.20 million current US$ 3.39 million current US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage, Australia or Sri Lanka?
Australia, at 300.02 million current US$ against 279.25 million current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage between Australia and Sri Lanka?
20.77 million current US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sri Lanka?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Australia and Sri Lanka rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage?
Australia ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage. Statizoid, drawing on Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/australia/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us/australia/sri-lanka/">Australia vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Particulate emissions damage is the damage due to exposure of a country's population to ambient concentrations of particulates measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), ambient ozone pollution, and indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in households cooking with solid fuels. Damages are calculated as foregone labor income due to premature death. Estimates of health impacts from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 are for 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013. Data for other years have been extrapolated from trends in mortality rates. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.