Democratic Republic of Congo vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) … unit

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0091 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Mauritania
0.0097 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
43rd
Mauritania rank
40th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) … unit over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Mauritania
0.010.020.030.04199020052021

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.0097 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0091 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritania ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 43rd and Mauritania ranks 40th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0292 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0367 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0076 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2000s 0.0212 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0248 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0035 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2010s 0.0133 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.013 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 0.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0096 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per unit, Democratic Republic of Congo or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0.0097 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0091 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per unit between Democratic Republic of Congo and Mauritania?
0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Mauritania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Mauritania rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per unit?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 43rd and Mauritania ranks 40th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/mauritania/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.