How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?

27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … capita

Equatorial Guinea

34.2 current US$ per person

in 2021

Serbia

33.75 current US$ per person

in 2021

Equatorial Guinea rank

22nd

Serbia rank

25th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … capita over time

Equatorial Guinea
Serbia

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 34.2 current US$ per person against 33.75 current US$ per person in Serbia, a difference of 0.45 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Serbia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd and Serbia ranks 25th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	9.17 current US$ per person	36.39 current US$ per person	27.22 current US$ per person	Serbia
2000s	69.85 current US$ per person	26.08 current US$ per person	43.78 current US$ per person	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	84.79 current US$ per person	29.39 current US$ per person	55.41 current US$ per person	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	32.65 current US$ per person	32.21 current US$ per person	0.4342 current US$ per person	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?: Equatorial Guinea, at 34.2 current US$ per person against 33.75 current US$ per person in Serbia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?: 0.45 current US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?: 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd and Serbia ranks 25th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/serbia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.