How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eritrea?

20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … capita

Ecuador

17.9 current US$ per person

in 2021

Eritrea

17.6 current US$ per person

in 2011

Ecuador rank

98th

Eritrea rank

100th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … capita over time

Ecuador
Eritrea

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 17.9 current US$ per person against 17.6 current US$ per person in Eritrea, a difference of 0.3 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eritrea ahead.

Ecuador ranks 98th and Eritrea ranks 100th of 179 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Eritrea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	6.56 current US$ per person	10.44 current US$ per person	3.87 current US$ per person	Eritrea
2000s	9.22 current US$ per person	13.38 current US$ per person	4.16 current US$ per person	Eritrea
2010s	16.21 current US$ per person	16.5 current US$ per person	0.2958 current US$ per person	Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Ecuador or Eritrea?: Ecuador, at 17.9 current US$ per person against 17.6 current US$ per person in Eritrea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Ecuador and Eritrea?: 0.3 current US$ per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eritrea?: 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
How do Ecuador and Eritrea rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?: Ecuador ranks 98th and Eritrea ranks 100th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-capita/ecuador/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-capita/ecuador/eritrea/">Ecuador vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.