Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … capita

Botswana
34.12 current US$ per person
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea
34.2 current US$ per person
in 2021
Botswana rank
23rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
22nd

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … capita over time

  • Botswana
  • Equatorial Guinea
050100150199020052021

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 34.2 current US$ per person against 34.12 current US$ per person in Botswana, a difference of 0.08 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 23rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 33.55 current US$ per person 8.7 current US$ per person 24.85 current US$ per person Botswana
2000s 29.18 current US$ per person 69.85 current US$ per person 40.67 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 36.33 current US$ per person 84.79 current US$ per person 48.46 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 33.5 current US$ per person 32.65 current US$ per person 0.8492 current US$ per person Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Botswana or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 34.2 current US$ per person against 34.12 current US$ per person in Botswana as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
0.08 current US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Botswana ranks 23rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-capita/botswana/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-capita/botswana/equatorial-guinea/">Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.