Barbados vs China: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … capita

Barbados
50.95 current US$ per person
in 2021
China
59.33 current US$ per person
in 2021
Barbados rank
9th
China rank
7th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … capita over time

  • Barbados
  • China
0204060199020052021

How they compare

China currently reports 59.33 current US$ per person against 50.95 current US$ per person in Barbados, a difference of 8.38 current US$ per person.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 9th and China ranks 7th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China Difference Ahead
1990s 23.17 current US$ per person 5.94 current US$ per person 17.23 current US$ per person Barbados
2000s 28.87 current US$ per person 11.77 current US$ per person 17.11 current US$ per person Barbados
2010s 41.31 current US$ per person 37.26 current US$ per person 4.05 current US$ per person Barbados
2020s 49.87 current US$ per person 55.23 current US$ per person 5.36 current US$ per person China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Barbados or China?
China, at 59.33 current US$ per person against 50.95 current US$ per person in Barbados as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Barbados and China?
8.38 current US$ per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Barbados ranks 9th and China ranks 7th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-capita/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-capita/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 5,502 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.