Cuba vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … annual

Cuba
12.79 % change on previous year
in 2020
Equatorial Guinea
12.69 % change on previous year
in 2021
Cuba rank
37th
Equatorial Guinea rank
39th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … annual over time

  • Cuba
  • Equatorial Guinea
-250255075199120062021

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 12.79 % change on previous year against 12.69 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.1 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Cuba ranks 37th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 39th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s -1.97 % change on previous year 11.61 % change on previous year 13.58 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2000s 1.59 % change on previous year 32.99 % change on previous year 31.41 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s 5.93 % change on previous year -4.53 % change on previous year 10.46 % change on previous year Cuba
2020s 12.79 % change on previous year -15.87 % change on previous year 28.66 % change on previous year Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), annual, Cuba or Equatorial Guinea?
Cuba, at 12.79 % change on previous year against 12.69 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), annual between Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
0.1 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
30 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2020.
How do Cuba and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), annual?
Cuba ranks 37th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 39th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/cuba/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/cuba/equatorial-guinea/">Cuba vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 5,314 data points, 1991–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.