Burkina Faso vs Croatia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … annual

Burkina Faso
4.14 % change on previous year
in 2021
Croatia
4.19 % change on previous year
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
125th
Croatia rank
124th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … annual over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Croatia
-40-2002040199120062021

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 4.19 % change on previous year against 4.14 % change on previous year in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.05 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Croatia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 125th and Croatia ranks 124th of 179 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 6.11 % change on previous year -3.56 % change on previous year 9.67 % change on previous year Burkina Faso
2000s 8.8 % change on previous year 7.94 % change on previous year 0.8562 % change on previous year Burkina Faso
2010s 4.18 % change on previous year -6.36 % change on previous year 10.54 % change on previous year Burkina Faso
2020s 6.66 % change on previous year 2.26 % change on previous year 4.39 % change on previous year Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), annual, Burkina Faso or Croatia?
Croatia, at 4.19 % change on previous year against 4.14 % change on previous year in Burkina Faso as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), annual between Burkina Faso and Croatia?
0.05 % change on previous year, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Croatia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
How do Burkina Faso and Croatia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), annual?
Burkina Faso ranks 125th and Croatia ranks 124th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Croatia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/burkina-faso/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-annual-growth-rate/burkina-faso/croatia/">Burkina Faso vs Croatia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 5,314 data points, 1991–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.