Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) … square

Guinea-Bissau
4,588 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Solomon Islands
5,429 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
132nd
Solomon Islands rank
129th

Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) … square over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Solomon Islands
-10.0k-5.0k05.0k198020002020

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 5,429 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,588 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 841 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 132nd and Solomon Islands ranks 129th of 175 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1980s -291.59 current US$ per square kilometre -6,004 current US$ per square kilometre 5,713 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 296.89 current US$ per square kilometre -3,133 current US$ per square kilometre 3,430 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 94.57 current US$ per square kilometre 269.81 current US$ per square kilometre 175.25 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre 2,608 current US$ per square kilometre 1,440 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 4,588 current US$ per square kilometre 5,429 current US$ per square kilometre 840.46 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square, Guinea-Bissau or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 5,429 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,588 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square between Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands?
841 current US$ per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands?
36 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 132nd and Solomon Islands ranks 129th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-national-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-national-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/solomon-islands/">Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 5,795 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.