Denmark vs Germany: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) … square

Denmark
1.52 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Germany
1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Denmark rank
16th
Germany rank
18th

Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) … square over time

  • Denmark
  • Germany
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197119962021

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 1.52 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre in Germany, a difference of 168,530 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Germany ahead.

Denmark ranks 16th and Germany ranks 18th of 175 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Germany Difference Ahead
1970s 99,724 current US$ per square kilometre 117,645 current US$ per square kilometre 17,921 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
1980s 88,589 current US$ per square kilometre 136,276 current US$ per square kilometre 47,687 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
1990s 259,022 current US$ per square kilometre 423,562 current US$ per square kilometre 164,540 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
2000s 536,983 current US$ per square kilometre 600,871 current US$ per square kilometre 63,888 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
2010s 930,366 current US$ per square kilometre 1.05 million current US$ per square kilometre 123,140 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
2020s 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 131,520 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square, Denmark or Germany?
Denmark, at 1.52 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre in Germany as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square between Denmark and Germany?
168,530 current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Germany?
47 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2021.
How do Denmark and Germany rank globally for adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square?
Denmark ranks 16th and Germany ranks 18th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Germany: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-national-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-national-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/germany/">Denmark vs Germany: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 5,795 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.